Page 25 - 2board23full

 

 

 

 

 

Page 25 - 2board23full
P. 25
05. OUR BUSINESS UNITS

Chart 5.2 Despite a shortfall by 1.5% in 2009 traffic, revenues from
AVA per Business Unit airport charges increased by 2.5% versus 2008, reaching
the amount of €181.1 million. Part of this revenue stream
is allocated –for VBM purposes– to Consumers and Property
Business Units. Revenues from ground handling activities and

50 44.5 45.1 Chart 5.4
40 2009 vs. 2008 Revenues from Airport Charges

30 27.1 26.6
€ Million
€ Million20100.0 87.7 86.7
90.0
10 08 09 2.5 6.3 1.0 0.8 80.0 08 09
70.0
0 08 09 08 09 60.0 PTF
50.0
Notes: 1) The segmentation of the Business Units is for VBM purposes only 40.0 43.4 45.7 37.1
and not related to regulatory Air/Non-Air Activities segmentation 30.0 33.6
20.0 08 09
2) Results do not include the 2009 once-off extraordinary profit 10.0 08 09
0.0 Landing
AVIATION BUSINESS UNIT 17.5 Security
15.4
During 2009 the Aviation Business Unit (ABU) continued
to guarantee safe and efficient operations with increased 08 09
number of aircraft movements, while offering high-standard
services to airport customers. A number of special events Parking
have been successfully managed with detailed planning
and efficient co-ordination with the involved parties, while airside concessions amounted to €48.8 million, demonstrating
the transition to the new Olympic group of companies was a growth rate of 9.2% vs. 2008.
successfully managed. Since airport operational safety has been recognised by
the Airport Company as a top priority, during 2009 the
Chart 5.3 number of serious incidents per 100,000 movements were
2009 Revenues from Airport Charges Breakdown maintained at a very low level of 66.14. In addition, there
was a reduction in the total number of reported incidents
SECURITY 20% LANDING 24% compared to 2008, resulting to a decrease of -11.17% to
the total number of incidents per 1000 movements.
PARKING 9%
Within the context of maintaining a high level of readiness
PTF 47% and effectiveness for handling potential crises, the Airport
Company conducted various scenario exercises for the purpose
of attesting the high level of safety, readiness, training, and
coordination of all parties involved in emergency situations
and of testing the Airport Emergency Plan (AEP) and related
emergency procedures. Four (4) emergency exercises took
place during 2009, including an “Aircraft Accident on the
Airport” exercise, in compliance with the airport company’s
obligations arising from the ICAO regulations. Participating
parties to these exercises were, the Airport Company, Athens
Airways, Swissport Hellas, Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority,
Fire Corps, Airport Services of Emergency Medical Care,
National Centre for Emergency Care (EKAV) and the Hellenic
Police. Emergency response performance was also tested
during the 134 real life situations throughout the year.

A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 0 9 23
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30